arnab221
06-26 01:02 PM
bumping up
wallpaper images paris at night poem.
yogirajd
11-10 07:28 PM
I am also in same boat. but I havn't filed I-485 yet, and in oct my I-140 got denied.
My EB2 was converted to EB3 while responding to previous query on EB2.
I want to opt only for EB2 cate.
My EB2 was converted to EB3 while responding to previous query on EB2.
I want to opt only for EB2 cate.
Macaca
03-06 08:44 PM
Some paras from Testing Time for Democrats (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/05/AR2007030501185.html)
The story of the new Congress is actually two stories. Democratic leaders and their grass-roots supporters will decide in the coming days which narrative will prevail.
In January, Democrats dominated the news, the public agenda and the Republicans. In the last weeks of February, the Republicans came back -- not by offering grand proposals but by using the limited tools they have to prove that Democrats don't have enough power, yet, to end the war in Iraq.
When they took control, Democrats looked crisp and disciplined, attributes not normally associated with their party. Speaker Nancy Pelosi's House quickly passed the Democrats' popular campaign promises, including measures on the minimum wage, stem cell research, renewable energy and reforms of the student loan and Medicare prescription drug programs.
This agenda had its skeptics, but it provided focus for a party long out of power and drew significant Republican defections, feeding a raft of "Republicans in Disarray" stories. Pelosi noted at a January news conference that so many Republicans voted for the Democratic proposals that one of her colleagues joked: "Maybe you made these bills too easy."
The Senate Democrats quickly pushed through a different version of the minimum-wage increase, and the party's leading foreign policy voices framed a critique of President Bush's Iraq policy that squared with the public's increasingly skeptical view of the war.
But recent weeks have held nothing but trouble for Democrats -- and it is odd, as one Democrat noted, that they should be on the defensive when the scandal over the treatment of wounded veterans at Walter Reed Army Medical Center has focused attention on yet another failed aspect of the administration's execution of the war and its aftermath.
Instead, one news story after another has highlighted differences among congressional Democrats over how to end the war. There is also the divide between the Washington party and activists at the grass roots and in the blogosphere. All of these problems are rooted in two unalterable facts: Democrats, on the basis of their thin majorities in Congress, lack the numbers to force an unwilling president to alter his course. And they are short of votes to cut off funds for the war altogether.
My Comments
Dems are not united on most issues.
Although this article is on Iraq, a similar situation will occur on Immigration. The big difference is that Dems are very interested in Iraq (they won elections on Iraq) whereas I haven't seen much much Democratic interest on Immigration.
The story of the new Congress is actually two stories. Democratic leaders and their grass-roots supporters will decide in the coming days which narrative will prevail.
In January, Democrats dominated the news, the public agenda and the Republicans. In the last weeks of February, the Republicans came back -- not by offering grand proposals but by using the limited tools they have to prove that Democrats don't have enough power, yet, to end the war in Iraq.
When they took control, Democrats looked crisp and disciplined, attributes not normally associated with their party. Speaker Nancy Pelosi's House quickly passed the Democrats' popular campaign promises, including measures on the minimum wage, stem cell research, renewable energy and reforms of the student loan and Medicare prescription drug programs.
This agenda had its skeptics, but it provided focus for a party long out of power and drew significant Republican defections, feeding a raft of "Republicans in Disarray" stories. Pelosi noted at a January news conference that so many Republicans voted for the Democratic proposals that one of her colleagues joked: "Maybe you made these bills too easy."
The Senate Democrats quickly pushed through a different version of the minimum-wage increase, and the party's leading foreign policy voices framed a critique of President Bush's Iraq policy that squared with the public's increasingly skeptical view of the war.
But recent weeks have held nothing but trouble for Democrats -- and it is odd, as one Democrat noted, that they should be on the defensive when the scandal over the treatment of wounded veterans at Walter Reed Army Medical Center has focused attention on yet another failed aspect of the administration's execution of the war and its aftermath.
Instead, one news story after another has highlighted differences among congressional Democrats over how to end the war. There is also the divide between the Washington party and activists at the grass roots and in the blogosphere. All of these problems are rooted in two unalterable facts: Democrats, on the basis of their thin majorities in Congress, lack the numbers to force an unwilling president to alter his course. And they are short of votes to cut off funds for the war altogether.
My Comments
Dems are not united on most issues.
Although this article is on Iraq, a similar situation will occur on Immigration. The big difference is that Dems are very interested in Iraq (they won elections on Iraq) whereas I haven't seen much much Democratic interest on Immigration.
2011 A Paris Poem
subba
07-11 09:07 AM
From Matthew Oh's website, sounds like labor sub will be history from next week.
What are people's guesses on how many of the BEC labor certifications will be rendered effectively useless because of this?
Also, does this mean it will be more straightforward to port PD after I140 approval (because the old employer has no benefit to revoking I140 anymore?)?
What are people's guesses on how many of the BEC labor certifications will be rendered effectively useless because of this?
Also, does this mean it will be more straightforward to port PD after I140 approval (because the old employer has no benefit to revoking I140 anymore?)?
more...
frost_oni
04-16 09:46 AM
wow, nice....i love akira!!!!
LondonTown
10-14 02:51 PM
Check your processing status on-line here:
http://www.pbls.doleta.gov/pbls_pds.cfm
Folks does any one have some info what are the processing times at Dallas and Phili. My LC is pending 2 years. Does anyone have any info what year cases the Dallas and Phili are processing.
Thanks much
http://www.pbls.doleta.gov/pbls_pds.cfm
Folks does any one have some info what are the processing times at Dallas and Phili. My LC is pending 2 years. Does anyone have any info what year cases the Dallas and Phili are processing.
Thanks much
more...
rpgamer2003
08-02 02:30 PM
Hi,
I'm a student from Germany (but very well-versed in English, since I've spent a year in the States just recently) and have had a lot of experience with Photoshop, Firworks, Dreamweaver, Flash und other stuff. I'm looking for some website to design or something like that.
I'm a student from Germany (but very well-versed in English, since I've spent a year in the States just recently) and have had a lot of experience with Photoshop, Firworks, Dreamweaver, Flash und other stuff. I'm looking for some website to design or something like that.
2010 house paris at night poem.
vk2082
07-22 01:24 PM
Hi,
I was on H4 and had applied for H1B in 2008. After long processing and being pending for a long time it finally got approved in July 2009.
My question is, does my H1B start from oct 2008 or oct 2009? Can someone reply me on this.
Thanks
I was on H4 and had applied for H1B in 2008. After long processing and being pending for a long time it finally got approved in July 2009.
My question is, does my H1B start from oct 2008 or oct 2009? Can someone reply me on this.
Thanks
more...
dkshitij
06-07 12:32 PM
my first PWD was submitted on feb 8 and it came back apr 8. the wage was too high. so a new pwd was submitted on apr 16. it came back today with a proper wage.
hair paris at night poem. paris at
bommanavasu
07-26 06:18 PM
Hi
Thanks a lot
Thanks a lot
more...
dealsnet
08-26 03:46 PM
My friend approved PERM in EB2 have qualification 3 year B.SC + 1 Year B.Ed + 2 year MSc. total 6 years of college, filed I-140 and was denied because of education. The labor is for Masters with 0-1 year experience. But they want 4 year degree prior to masters, citing EDGE database. Now the appeal is with AAO.
My question:
1. Do he can apply with the same labor for EB3 ?. What is the chance with two I-140 with same labor ?
( He filed I-140 for EB2 with that labor before 6 months of PERM certification. The PERM certified on April 2009 )
2. Or he need to do a fresh PERM with EB3 as a backup till the AAO verdict ? (takes 22 months)
My question:
1. Do he can apply with the same labor for EB3 ?. What is the chance with two I-140 with same labor ?
( He filed I-140 for EB2 with that labor before 6 months of PERM certification. The PERM certified on April 2009 )
2. Or he need to do a fresh PERM with EB3 as a backup till the AAO verdict ? (takes 22 months)
hot paris at night poem. paris at
minimalist
11-21 11:10 AM
I recall that USCIS was planning to issue 2 year AP and 2 year EAD. I see that the 2 year EAD has been implemented. ANy idea, if and when the 2 year AP implementation is expected?
Thanks
Thanks
more...
house Two poems for Per Kirkeby and
martinvisalaw
04-09 02:17 PM
You can apply again if you have a new employer, or even if the same employer will reapply. However, if you were denied for a reason that is still a problem, such as not having the required degree or experience equivalent, there is no point in reapplying. Good luck.
tattoo paris at night poem. paris at
TeddyKoochu
12-28 12:14 PM
Please let me know!!
I think you can log on to uscis.gov and check the case status for receipt number, always good to add this receipt number to your account (User Account) where you can track your portfolio.
I think you can log on to uscis.gov and check the case status for receipt number, always good to add this receipt number to your account (User Account) where you can track your portfolio.
more...
pictures pictures corner of Paris the night; paris at night poem. photos of Paris at
Macaca
06-23 06:11 PM
Veto Signals Start of a Risky Political Game (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/23/AR2007062300051.html) By Jeffrey H. Birnbaum, June 24, 2007
George W. Bush has been the most accommodating of presidents. He has rarely used his veto pen to kill legislation. Until now.
Last week, Bush vetoed a bill that would have expanded federally funded embryonic stem-cell research. He said scientific advances allow researchers to pursue lifesaving work without destroying human embryos. It was his third veto ever.
But there will soon be more. Lots more, and almost every one of them will have an impact on the markets and business growth.
Bush has attacked the opposition party for "excessive spending" and has vowed to veto many of Congress's 12 appropriations bills, which are on track to exceed his wishes by $23 billion in the next fiscal year.
In response, some Democrats have said they can play that game, too. A faction thinks the last thing they should do is let pass almost any legislative initiative Bush and his party can claim credit for, including the immigration and energy bills Congress is working on.
These confrontations are shortsighted no matter who's to blame. A budget impasse would depress markets and weaken the dollar. Failure of the immigration bill would threaten businesses that hire illegal immigrants with increased sanctions or compel them to hire fewer people, either of which would lead to higher prices. And energy shortages could easily become chronic unless more is done to reduce our reliance on high-price oil.
Shallow political finger-pointing is not an adequate response.
George W. Bush has been the most accommodating of presidents. He has rarely used his veto pen to kill legislation. Until now.
Last week, Bush vetoed a bill that would have expanded federally funded embryonic stem-cell research. He said scientific advances allow researchers to pursue lifesaving work without destroying human embryos. It was his third veto ever.
But there will soon be more. Lots more, and almost every one of them will have an impact on the markets and business growth.
Bush has attacked the opposition party for "excessive spending" and has vowed to veto many of Congress's 12 appropriations bills, which are on track to exceed his wishes by $23 billion in the next fiscal year.
In response, some Democrats have said they can play that game, too. A faction thinks the last thing they should do is let pass almost any legislative initiative Bush and his party can claim credit for, including the immigration and energy bills Congress is working on.
These confrontations are shortsighted no matter who's to blame. A budget impasse would depress markets and weaken the dollar. Failure of the immigration bill would threaten businesses that hire illegal immigrants with increased sanctions or compel them to hire fewer people, either of which would lead to higher prices. And energy shortages could easily become chronic unless more is done to reduce our reliance on high-price oil.
Shallow political finger-pointing is not an adequate response.
dresses paris at night poem. paris at
ektha123
12-24 07:57 PM
I got H1 this year. I was applied my ssn on oct 9 th. still i didn't get my ssn number. two days back ssn people called and told that "in online it is showing your EAd card. so we can give u ssn if you bring the EAD card". My question is if i give my EAD, will the h1 get cancelled. please suggest me.
more...
makeup Paris by night; Paris by night
Blog Feeds
08-17 09:30 AM
For the past few months, there have been no green cards available for persons in the employment-based third preference category (EB-3) and long backlogs in the EB-2 category for persons born in India and China. So, with few green cards to grant, why has the USCIS been scheduling interviews for persons in these categories? The short answer is that just because the USCIS cannot grant most EB-3 and EB-2 applicants green cards, the agency can take advantage of the lull in applications for adjustment of status to deny persons with pending applications. How can they do that? Easy! Let's say...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/07/how-to-use-your-h-1b-to-qualify-under-section-245k.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/07/how-to-use-your-h-1b-to-qualify-under-section-245k.html)
girlfriend tattoo A Night in Paris
ssksubash
05-04 08:38 AM
Hi,
Do we have to pay the issuance fee if we are getting stamping in India. I am getting my H1B stamping in chennai. I am in my 8th yr of H1B.
Can any one please inform me about this ? Also if any one recently had their stamping done, can you please post your experience.
Thanks,
Do we have to pay the issuance fee if we are getting stamping in India. I am getting my H1B stamping in chennai. I am in my 8th yr of H1B.
Can any one please inform me about this ? Also if any one recently had their stamping done, can you please post your experience.
Thanks,
hairstyles paris at night poem.
gconmymind
07-30 03:31 PM
PERM is for future job. You should be fine. You are being paid per your H1B labor..
truthinspector
12-11 10:07 PM
Does anyone have the latest on labor substitution? I am being offered a pre-approved labor. I will have to switch to a not so good employer for the same. I want to know if there are known rumors at this moment about cancellation of pre-approved labor.
Any advice would be highly appreciated.
Any advice would be highly appreciated.
ektha123
01-02 09:14 AM
Hi
yesterday i got an email for my expedite request that "document mailed" this means the approval or rfe.In how many days i expect the mail.any suggestions are appreciated.
yesterday i got an email for my expedite request that "document mailed" this means the approval or rfe.In how many days i expect the mail.any suggestions are appreciated.
No comments:
Post a Comment